...
Let us unmask the clown, forget the frown, and observe, whom, of us, is the
fool. You have wrote this:
Be it the christians the muslims the budists etc, etc. And everything you whine about on here is tottaly and utterly fake misleading you to belive something that isnt there.
It sounds, to me, that you dislike religion. You also claim to be an atheist. So far, we haven't a fool in the game...
Here's where the stench arise: when you claim to be an atheist if only because you cannot have a "prove" of God or whatever prove you desire. This noise is intolerable - I suppose you have a "prove" of everything in your life? I suppose you have a prove of the written history, the "truth" politics want you to hear; I suppose you have a prove that you are, indeed, a
thing even worthy of being called a species, much less, a human? You look around, and
life itself
lacks a prove, lacks order...yet you dare whimper, dare point the finger, whine and flutter as you do, demanding a prove of only a sliver of the whole. I bet that you follow religious morals as well, I bet that you will, if you can,
marry, and marriage is a subspecies of religion, or divine belief – and how contradictory would you appear to me at that moment, how pitifully confused!
To
want a prove at all is to already be a believer, but unlike many other believers, you are a
doubter - you already submit to the thesis that "there is a God," you already conformed, you simply have not found the conclusion yet. And what might such a satisfying conclusion look like - would you like a sign of God, a word, another Holy Book, or would you dismiss those again, and cry in your foolish misery, wanting more prove, more of something, anything! - as long as it is
more! And wouldn't such a prove become unworthy in years to come to others just like you, each cries in their agony, "wanting a prove!" Would not
your belief, the moment that
you saw a prove,
prove once and for all that there is a "God?" Yes, it does, but others would want their own prove...and notice, how in your case,
you are the others, following the foot steps of the
believers from the past.
You are the child, the typical agonized child, the enslaved, the unfree – you have been given two choices: believe
or believe – the difference is comical. The choices you are given constitute the only domain of thought you marvel in, thinking, liking to believe, even if deceptively, that you are a free thinker, when contrarily, you are the slave of your experience, the slave of the world, the peasant of the spoken word, and as far as can be from being the slave of your own mind. And notice, at this moment, how I have described you exactly as I would have described
the religious clown – as I said, the difference between you and the religious is indifferent - yet you
insist that you are different by tagging the term "atheist" on your back - to me, you appear like a person who says that he does not like to run
because he
likes to run - my only choice, at this point, is to offer sincere pity...however, I cannot
prove to you, that I am, indeed, feeling pity towards you.
). Sure, I'm an atheist, but that's just because I see no evidence of a god, and if there were one I would want nothing to do with it.