CPA Set - Finalize cards

L

Limited

Guest
If you can use it only once per turn, I don't think it needs the more-than-one creature restriction.

"Sacrifice all other creatures, discard your hand: Draw seven cards. Use this ability only once each turn. "
 
Mooseman

Mooseman

Isengar Tussle
Sure, If it's true that you can't sac zero other creatures..... as I think this is intended to be. I'm not sure about that.... X can be zero, but can a general sac others be zero......
 
L

Limited

Guest
I don't quite follow, but the way I worded it, you can use its ability when you control just him.

And that's not so bad is it?
 
Mooseman

Mooseman

Isengar Tussle
So you're saying you can sac zero other creatures and still use the ability....
I don't believe that was the intent of the card.
Maybe it should be "discard your hand and draw a card for each creature sac'd for this ability"
Or the must have another creature in play restiriction is needed to keep to the original intent.
But, I could be wrong.
Ransac?
 
R

Ransac

CPA Trash Man
I still think that Limited's way is fine. I say leave as we have it now and comment from playtesting.


Ransac, cpa trash man
 
Mooseman

Mooseman

Isengar Tussle
Card Name: Leeway
Color: U
Cost: 1U
Type: Instant
Pow/Tgh:
Rules Text: Counter target spell. If that spell is countered this way, shuffle it into its owner’s library instead of into that player’s graveyard.
That spell's controller may draw a card.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: U
Artist:
Number: 49/186

Card Name: Mage Jut-ve
Color: U
Cost: 2U
Type: Creature - Wizard
Pow/Tgh: 1/1
Rules Text: Retreat (If this creature is returned to your hand from play, Draw a card)
Flavor Text:
Rarity: C
Artist:
Number: 50/186

Anything?
 
L

Limited

Guest
I'm thinking Leeway could be uncommon..

other than that, I like them
 
Mooseman

Mooseman

Isengar Tussle
OK,
But is this wording very good?

"Counter target spell, then shuffle it into its controller's library"

maybe just to clean it up.
Counter target spell, then shuffle it into its owner's library
 
Mooseman

Mooseman

Isengar Tussle
Card Name: Mislay Delete this card
Color: U
Cost: 1U
Type: Instant
Pow/Tgh:
Rules Text: Counter target spell. If that spell is countered this way, shuffle it into its owner’s library instead of into that player’s graveyard.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: C
Artist:
Number: 51/186

Card Name: Orb of Knowledge
Color: U
Cost: UU
Type: Enchantment
Pow/Tgh:
Rules Text: When Orb of Knowledge comes into play, draw two cards.
When Orb of Knowledge leaves play, discard your hand.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: C
Artist:
Number: 52/186

MisLay seems to be the same as Leeway and I don't have Mislay in my original list...... hmmmmmm Just keep one of them.

Orb - doesn't seem to do that much, but it isn't broke.
 
L

Limited

Guest
Mislay and Leeway do seem to be two versions of the same idea.. perhaps we should Zigathon which one he likes best? (it was his idea, wasn't it?)

The Orb is fine. I'd usually assume an Orb is an artifact, but Dispersing Orb is also a (blue) enchantment.
 
Mooseman

Mooseman

Isengar Tussle
Card Name: Revered Djinn
Color: U
Cost: 4U
Type: Creature - Djinn
Pow/Tgh: 3/5
Rules Text: Flying (This creature can't be blocked except by creatures with flying.)
Whenever a creature blocks or is blocked by Revered Djinn, that creature loses flying permanently.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: C
Artist:
Number: 53/186

This is definately not a common. I remember there was a lot of discussion about this card, but I kind of like the way it is.
 
L

Limited

Guest
I like the way it is too!

Was there a lot of discussion about this card? I can't remember. I only know I forgot to add the "or blocked by" when I first posted it..
 
Mooseman

Mooseman

Isengar Tussle
Card Name: Prejudice
Color: U
Cost: 4UU
Type: Enchantment
Pow/Tgh:
Rules Text: Tap three untapped creatures you control: Return target permanent to it's owner's hand.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: U
Artist:
Number: 54/186

Card Name: Seal of Time Delete this card
Color: U
Cost: 1UU
Type: Enchantment
Pow/Tgh:
Rules Text: 1U, Sacrifice Seal of Time: Take another turn after the end of your turn. After that turn, skip your next turn.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: C
Artist:
Number: 55/186

Isn't Trade Riders just Tradwind Riders in enchantment format? I would rather have it shuffle target permenet into it's owners library.

Even though Seal of Time is my effort, I don't like it anymore. I'm not thrilled with the "take and extra turn" effect. It is to much of an advantage.
 
L

Limited

Guest
Rider's Trade isn't very exciting.. Perhaps you shouldn't be able to target your own permanents? Or only non-lands?

Seal of Time feels like Final Fortune, only blue. Not very exciting either. I'm okay with axing it..
 
Mooseman

Mooseman

Isengar Tussle
Limited said:
Seal of Time feels like Final Fortune, only blue. Not very exciting either. I'm okay with axing it..
Click to expand...
It will be put on the chopping block...
Limited said:
Rider's Trade isn't very exciting.. Perhaps you shouldn't be able to target your own permanents? Or only non-lands?
Click to expand...
If we change it from "Return to hand" to "Shuffle into owners library", we'll make it different and more powerful against opponents, but weaker for yourself. How about Trade Sanctions or Undo Pressure or .......

Card Name: Rider's Trade This name is very bad too
Color: U
Cost: 2UU
Type: Enchantment
Pow/Tgh:
Rules Text: Tap three untapped creatures you control: Shuffle target permanent into it's owner's library.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: C
Artist:
Number: 54/186
 
L

Limited

Guest
Shuffling it back into an owner's library sounds more white than blue..

And for the name.. how about Oblatory? Oblatorium?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top