CPA Set - Finalize cards

[Mooseman]

Vigilance? and adjust the p/t

 

[Limited]

Giving it vigilance would make it a total stall card; your opponent loses a chumpblocker each turn while not being able to attack you..

I do think that, at three mana, most opponents will not have had a change to play a decent amount of creatures and will not be able to kill it in combat (by blocking with multiple creatures). Therefor, I would like to suggest we leave it at 7/7 for 2WW and see what playtesting brings..

(keeping 6/6, or Vigilance in mind of course)

Deal?

 

[Mooseman]

Works for me.... I'll get the next one out.

 

[Mooseman]

Card Name: Intimidated Eagle
Color: W
Cost: 2W
Type: Creature - Bird
Pow/Tgh: 3/1
Rules Text: Unless any player controls a Mountain, Intimidated Eagle has flying
Flavor Text:
Rarity: C
Artist:
Number: 7/186


I like this one as is.

 

[Ransac]

Me too. Next!

Ransac, cpa trash man

 

[Limited]

Yes, Next!
(although this was kinda tied in to the Odd One Out feel, so maybe we should later change Mountain to something more appropriate flavorwise..)

 

[Mooseman]

I would leave it Mountain, as if it can't fly over them.....

 

[Mooseman]

Card Name: Jackdaw
Color: W
Cost: 1W
Type: Creature - Bird
Pow/Tgh: 1/1
Rules Text: Flying (This creature can't be blocked except by creatures with flying.)
Sacrifice Jackdaw to deal 2 damage to target attacking creature.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: C
Artist:
Number: 8/186


I like this card. Anyone else?

 

[Limited]

Wording should be something like
"Sacrifice Jackdaw: Jackdaw deals two damage to target attacking creature"

 

[Mooseman]

Yes. Better wording.

 

[DarthFerret]

I second the card with the revised wording.

 

[Mooseman]

Okay, Card 8 is done.

I realize this is going fairly fast, so if anyone has any major problems with a completed card, just yell.

 

[Mooseman]

Card Name: Orb of Renewal
Color: W
Cost: WW
Type: Enchantment
Pow/Tgh:
Rules Text: When <THIS> comes into play, gain 6 life.
When <THIS> leaves play, lose half your life, rounded up.



I'd just add "rounded up" to the end of the rules text.

 

[Ransac]

I agree.

OO! Quick note. For every card that refers to itself in the rules text, put <THIS> in it's place. It registers better with the editor program.

And does anybody have an updated file of the set?


Ransac, cpa trash man

 

[DarthFerret]

My file is fairly updated, however, I got most of them from Mooseman, so maybe he should provide the file (granted that he is using the editor of course). If not, maybe I can get the file totally done this weekend, and ship it to you UPS like!

 

[Mooseman]

I am not using the editor, just lowly Word.
My desktop crashed and I lost a lot of stuff.

 

[Ransac]

If that's the case, DF, can you send the file to the Odd_One_Out account?


Ransac, cpa trash man

 

[DarthFerret]

Yes, I can. Give me until the late weekend to get it updated, then will email it to the account.

 

[Mooseman]

Card Name: Protected Knight
Color: W
Cost: 3WW
Type: Creature - Knight
Pow/Tgh: 3/3
Rules Text: First Strike (This creature deals damage before creatures without First Strike.)
When Protected Knight comes into play, choose a color. Protected Knight has protection from the chosen color.

Flavor Text:
Rarity: C
Artist:
Number: 10/186

This is a strong creature, but it seems to maybe be an uncommon, but this may be common to our set....

 

[Ransac]

I liken it more to uncommon. It's similar to Voice of All, except it's bigger and with first strike. Heck, depending on the set, this may have been a rare.


Ransac, cpa trash man