CPA Set - Finalize cards

[Mooseman]

Card Name: Garmswood Totem Chief
Color: G
Cost: 3G
Type: Creature - Minion
Pow/Tgh: 2/2
Rules Text: R: Garmswood Totem Chief becomes a 5/1 Berserker with First Strike until EOT
Flavor Text:
Rarity: U
Artist:
Number: 133/186

Card Name: Garmswood Totem Minion
Color: G
Cost: 2G
Type: Creature - Minion
Pow/Tgh: 2/1
Rules Text: G: Garmswood Totem Minion becomes a 3/3 Bear with Trample until EOT
Flavor Text:
Rarity: C
Artist:
Number: 134/186

Card Name: Garmswood Totem Shaman
Color: G
Cost: 4G
Type: Creature - Minion
Pow/Tgh: 2/2
Rules Text: 1B,T: All Minions gain fear until EOT
Flavor Text:
Rarity: U
Artist:
Number: 135/186

Anything?

 

[Limited]

They all seem just fine.. perhaps the Garmswood Totem Shaman could even be an uncommon instead of a rare?

 

[Mooseman]

Card Name: Intimidating Growth v1 - Delete this
Color: G
Cost: 1G
Type: Instant
Pow/Tgh:
Rules Text: Target creature gets +3/+3 until end of turn. Tap any target creature for each U spent to play Intimidating Growth v1.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: C
Artist:
Number: 136/186

Card Name: Intimidating Growth v2 - Delete This
Color: G
Cost: XGG
Type: Instant
Pow/Tgh:
Rules Text: Target creature gets +X/+X until end of turn. For each U spent to play Intimidating Growth v2, each opponent taps an untapped creature he or she controls.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: C
Artist:
Number: 137/186

Card Name: Intimidating Growth
Color: G
Cost: 4G
Type: Instant
Pow/Tgh:
Rules Text: Target creature gets +5/+5 until end of turn. For each U spent to play Intimidating Growth, each opponent taps an untapped creature he or she controls.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: U
Artist:
Number: 138/186

Intimidating Growth v2 – (name: Threatening Growth)

Intimidating Growth v3 – (name: Terrorizing Growth)

I would change Intimidating Growth v1 to be:
" Target creature gets +3/+3 until end of turn. If U spent to play Intimidating Growth v1, that creature also gains flying.

Do we want all three versions?

 

[Ransac]

I think we only want one of these, and my vote is for V.3.

Name should stay Intimidating Growth for it.


Ransac, cpa trash man

 

[Mooseman]

How about these two?

Card Name: Giant Spider Strength
Color: G
Cost: 1G
Type: Instant
Pow/Tgh:
Rules Text: Target creature gets +2/+2 until end of turn. If U spent to play Giant Spider Strength, that creature also gains flying.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: C
Artist:
Number: 136/186

Card Name: Intimidating Growth
Color: G
Cost: 4G
Type: Instant
Pow/Tgh:
Rules Text: Target creature gets +5/+5 until end of turn. For each U spent to play Intimidating Growth , each opponent taps an untapped creature he or she controls.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: U
Artist:
Number: 138/186

 

[Ransac]

Eh, the blue really doesn't fit with a Giant Spider concept. Plus, it would be "and can block creatures with flying".


Ransac, cpa trash man

 

[Limited]

I think there should only be one green spell with "if U was spent" and my vote would also go to Intimidating Growth v3..

(and by selecting only one, we don't have to change the name)

 

[Mooseman]

Card Name: Mine the Void
Color: G
Cost: 1G
Type: Sorcery
Pow/Tgh:
Rules Text: Return target land card RFG to play under your control tappped.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: C
Artist:
Number: 139/186

Card Name: Nathiz Mammoth
Color: G
Cost: 2GG
Type: Creature - Elephant
Pow/Tgh: 3/3
Rules Text: Forestcast 2: You may remove 2 Forest cards from your hand from the game rather than pay this spell's mana cost)
Trample (If all the creatures blocking this creature receive lethal damage, remaining damage can be assigned to the defending player.)
Flavor Text:
Rarity: U
Artist:
Number: 140/186

Card Name: Orb of Growth
Color: G
Cost: GG
Type: Enchantment
Pow/Tgh:
Rules Text: When Orb of Growth comes into play, search your library for up to two Forests and put them into play tapped.
When Orb of Growth leaves play, sacrifice all Forests you control.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: C
Artist:
Number: 141/186

Mine the Void - Lose the entire U thing, just get land. Still common

Mammoth - Uncommon

Orb - Common

 

[Limited]

I agree with all your changes...

 

[Mooseman]

Card Name: Sage Elf
Color: G
Cost: 1G
Type: Creature - Elf
Pow/Tgh: 1/1
Rules Text: T: Add B, R, G, or W to your mana pool.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: R
Artist:
Number: 142/186

Card Name: Shalla Grimm
Color: G
Cost: 3G
Type: Legendary Creature - Human Berserker
Pow/Tgh: 3/2
Rules Text: Whenever a berserker attacks, it gets +2/+0 and trample. Sacrifice that creature at end of turn.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: R
Artist:
Number: 143/186

Card Name: Strength from Soil
Color: G
Cost: XGGG
Type: Sorcery
Pow/Tgh:
Rules Text: Put X +1/+1 counters divided among any number of target creatures.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: U
Artist:
Number: 144/186

Sage Elf - I like it.....

Shalla Grimm - Legendary Creature - Berserker. Rare or Uncommon?

Strength from Soil -
Put X +1/+1 counters divided among any number of target creatures.
Sould be uncommon

 

[Ransac]

Same here


Ransac, cpa trash man

 

[Mooseman]

You both agreed with me?????? Woo Hoo....

 

[Limited]

Shalla Grimm should definitely be rare.. (and a Legendary Creature - Human Berserker)

And Strength of Soil can easily be an uncommon and doesn't need the 'you control' restriction

 

[Mooseman]

Gotcha.....
On to the next few.....

 

[Mooseman]

Card Name: Ursine's Spirit Spark
Color: G
Cost: 1G
Type: Instant
Pow/Tgh:
Rules Text: Destroy target enchantment or put a 2/2 Green Bear token into play.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: R
Artist:
Number: 145/186


Card Name: Void Pack
Color: G
Cost: 2G
Type: Creature - Wolves
Pow/Tgh: 2/2
Rules Text: Remove target card in your hand from the game: Void Pack gets +1/+1 until end of turn.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: U
Artist:
Number: 146/186

Card Name: Wandering Sprite
Color: G
Cost: GG
Type: Creature - Faerie
Pow/Tgh: 2/2
Rules Text: Flying (This creature can't be blocked except by creatures with flying.)
Sacrifice Wandering Sprite if you don't control an Island.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: C
Artist:
Number: 147/186

Card Name: Bulging Muscles
Color: G
Cost: 1GG
Type: Instant
Pow/Tgh:
Rules Text: Forestcast 1: You may remove 1 Forest card from your hand from the game rather than pay this spell's mana cost)
Target creature gets +3/+3 until end of turn.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: C
Artist:
Number: 148/186


Unrhystic Resonance - I hate this name, Resonating Wind? Bear Hex? Ursine Wind?
This is an umcommon.

Void Pack - uncommon?
Wandering Sprite - common?

Warrior’s Rage - 1GG is very expensive, but the forestcast1 is good. Still common?
If it's to be rare, then I suggest it become a +3/+3 counter that stays on it.

 

[Limited]

I don't like the Unrhystic Resonance at all. A spell that destroy target enchantment is usually white.. but a Bear token definitely wouldn't be. How about completely changing it to ..

Ursine's Spirit Spark WG
Instant
Destroy target enchantment and put a 2/2 Green Bear token into play.

Rare.. or maybe uncommon?

Wandering Sprite is definitely a common.

Void Pack seems uncommon. Perhaps it could be a common at 3G.

Warrior's Rage can be common I guess.. we could at least try it like this. Only thing I don't like about it is the name: referring to Warriors and Rage seems something Red would do. Most green spells imply somekind of growth.. Bulgen? (its not a word, but it sounds kinda right)

 

[Mooseman]

Garden Gnome!

But I like Agoraphobic Ursine & Serf Gardner..

We could leave the wurm as is, but I thought of a problem: if you cast him, and control no other creatures, you wont have to put any creatures on top of your library. We could add the "or sacrifice" but as you've seen with the other Capricious ones I am really trying to avoid that.
I still think it wouldn't be too good (but I admit I could be wrong) that the card should be okay as:

Card Name: Capricious Wurm
Color: G
Cost: 1GG
Type: Creature - Wurm
Pow/Tgh: 4/4
Rules Text: Trample (If all the creatures blocking this creature receive lethal damage, remaining damage can be assigned to the defending player.)
When Capricious Wurm comes into play, put a creature you control on top of your library.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: U
Artist:
Number: 127/186

but perhaps, as a compromise, you could consider:


Card Name: Capricious Wurm
Color: G
Cost: 1GG
Type: Creature - Wurm
Pow/Tgh: 3/4
Rules Text: Trample (If all the creatures blocking this creature receive lethal damage, remaining damage can be assigned to the defending player.)
When Capricious Wurm comes into play, put a creature you control on top of your library.
Flavor Text:
Rarity: U
Artist:
Number: 127/186

Sorry Limited, I seemed to have missed this post.
Let me address one part:
When the wurm CIP, if you controll no other creatures, you put the wurm on top of your library, as it's the only creature you control.
The other one's need the "Or Sacrifice" since they deal with something not a creature, like lands or cards from you hand, where the drawback can be avoided. The wurm can avoid the drawback.

 

[Limited]

When the wurm CIP, if you controll no other creatures, you put the wurm on top of your library, as it's the only creature you control.

Ah right. I was confusing it with "put two target creatures" ... but I still think just one would be enough of a drawback. But we'll leave it at two for now.

The other one's need the "Or Sacrifice" since they deal with something not a creature, like lands or cards from you hand, where the drawback can be avoided. The wurm can not? avoid the drawback.

I don't think any of them need the "or sacrifice" part added; the green one is a lot harder to avoid, but you could still find ways to turn it into something else.. say, an enchantment (Only Soul Sculptor is a creature, so it would be put on top. Anyway)
But the Red has no drawback if you have no lands. Well, I'm fine with a creature being a bit better when you are in that board position. Same thing goes for emptying your hand.

I never made a black and a white one did I?

Capricious Horror 1BB
Creature - Horror
Fear
When ~ comes into play, an opponent (puts/may put) a card from your graveyard on top of your library
2/2

Capricious Paladin 1WW
Vigilance
????
2/3

I'm stumped on the white one

 

[Mooseman]

I don't like the Unrhystic Resonance at all. A spell that destroy target enchantment is usually white.. but a Bear token definitely wouldn't be. How about completely changing it to ..

Ursine's Spirit Spark WG
Instant
Destroy target enchantment and put a 2/2 Green Bear token into play.

Rare.. or maybe uncommon?

Wandering Sprite is definitely a common.

Void Pack seems uncommon. Perhaps it could be a common at 3G.

Warrior's Rage can be common I guess.. we could at least try it like this. Only thing I don't like about it is the name: referring to Warriors and Rage seems something Red would do. Most green spells imply somekind of growth.. Bulgen? (its not a word, but it sounds kinda right)

Naturalize is Green..... I like the name
Keep it green and give the choice to the caster.

Ursine's Spirit Spark 1G
Instant
Destroy target enchantment or put a 2/2 Green Bear token into play.
Rare

Bulgen muscles? Warrior's Courage? Warrior's Might? Warrior's Prowess?
Bulgen Might?

 

[Limited]

Ursine's Spirit Spark 1G
Instant
Destroy target enchantment or put a 2/2 Green Bear token into play.
Rare

Deal

Bulgen muscles? Warrior's Courage? Warrior's Might? Warrior's Prowess?
Bulgen Might?

I was also trying to avoid the Warrior part.. also not the first thing that comes to mind considering green. But I like Bulgen Muscles (although it would probably become Bulging Muscles, to make it actually english)