U
Ura
Guest
Something everyone should realize is that this, depending on who did it, is not about foreign policy and politics.
For instance if it is Usama Bin Ladin it has nothing to do with making peace or what america or other countries foreign policy is like, its a jihad, a holy war.
The very basis of western capitalism is against islamic teachings and the way of life is drastically different. When the extremists see this its a reason to abolish and attack even though islam also is supposed to teach peace, they just don't look at it like other more sensible islamic nations. Bin Ladin doesn't attack the US or the rest of us because of where we are or what we're doing. He uses terrorism against us because we exist, simple as that. Islamic extremists such as Bin Ladin and the Taliban dislike or hate the western way of life because of their zelous religious beliefs. Bin Ladin thinks he is a holy man, a messiha, and that his attacks are because of the will of god. It has nothing to do with oil or arms sales (which every major military power in the world is guilty of, not just the US.)
We are the anti-christs to people like this and our existence is the only reason that they do what they do, it doesn't matter if we retreat with in our borders or are involved around the world.
I would honestly hate to see the world where the US, UN, and NATO were not involved in international affairs. All over the middle east and parts of the old Soviet Union have there been confrontations and wars that would have ended very differently without this kind of involvement. They can't simply just withdraw everywhere, the world doesn't work like that and it never has.
Of couse maybe we should just withdraw into our own borders and let all the warring nations in the world kill each other off, then we can just go in and clean up the mess afterwards, good riddence to bad rubbish. Maybe have another WWII in the end.
And as I've said once before, the line between justice and vengence is very very thin to the point where the only distinguishing between them is the sevarity of the execution of them.
For instance if it is Usama Bin Ladin it has nothing to do with making peace or what america or other countries foreign policy is like, its a jihad, a holy war.
The very basis of western capitalism is against islamic teachings and the way of life is drastically different. When the extremists see this its a reason to abolish and attack even though islam also is supposed to teach peace, they just don't look at it like other more sensible islamic nations. Bin Ladin doesn't attack the US or the rest of us because of where we are or what we're doing. He uses terrorism against us because we exist, simple as that. Islamic extremists such as Bin Ladin and the Taliban dislike or hate the western way of life because of their zelous religious beliefs. Bin Ladin thinks he is a holy man, a messiha, and that his attacks are because of the will of god. It has nothing to do with oil or arms sales (which every major military power in the world is guilty of, not just the US.)
We are the anti-christs to people like this and our existence is the only reason that they do what they do, it doesn't matter if we retreat with in our borders or are involved around the world.
I would honestly hate to see the world where the US, UN, and NATO were not involved in international affairs. All over the middle east and parts of the old Soviet Union have there been confrontations and wars that would have ended very differently without this kind of involvement. They can't simply just withdraw everywhere, the world doesn't work like that and it never has.
Of couse maybe we should just withdraw into our own borders and let all the warring nations in the world kill each other off, then we can just go in and clean up the mess afterwards, good riddence to bad rubbish. Maybe have another WWII in the end.
And as I've said once before, the line between justice and vengence is very very thin to the point where the only distinguishing between them is the sevarity of the execution of them.
