...first of all, this thread was a joke - Aku simply took the idea seriously on AIM and just was so compelled to post, that he decided to actually do it.
But I still say it's interesting.
I like everyone. I honestly don't hold anyone responsible for what they say to me or to each other. Ultimately, I don't believe in free will. What I hold every man and women for is a vague sense of honesty: to admit when one is an inferior animal, that one is a slave, that one is a thing to be looked down at. I respect those who admit that they are wrong when they argue the way they do. Ah, my God, I have seen members who simply never give up, who insist tirelessly, even when they begin to lose ground - at the end, they perform their magic: they simply decide to "leave" the subject, as in, escape the scene where they are shown in the spot light as the animal who is being embarrassed, the animal who had lost the duel, who had fallen. Not a single air of decency hovers around them, no sincerity, no self-confrontation, no confession of one’s failure…
Closed minded and a jerk I am: no wiser truth can be seen when seeing how I treat other members, and in real life, how I treat other people. Indeed, closed minded and unfriendly, if you want to say that. All it boils down to is having principles: those who are willing to die for what they believe in we call "closed minded," "dogmatic," and we see them as hateful creatures. And those who get a long with everyone, who "tolerate" everyone, who "tolerate" in general, I see as insecure fellows who can't, or don't, want to be argued with, hence, they "tolerate." Why tolerate? To be tolerated, that is, to be ignored. To focus on "happiness" instead, to focus on nothing but empty jargon. I'm not like that. I will argue from dawn to dusk, from today till the end. And I will make my case. And damn right, I will be dogmatic and offensive about it...I will be fanatical, discriminating, and hold prejudice against inferior human beings who believe themselves to be "individual," "unique," "great," "worthy," who believe in themselves in general.
What I am annoyed with are people of the "agree to disagree" logic, of the "let's put it off" and "talk about it no longer" taste. Until a victory has been achieved, until a right has been declared over what is wrong, I will not agree to disagree, put it off, or dismiss the subject.
I like everyone. But I feel more comfortable around other members: Sageridder, Chaos Turtle, Purple Jester (which we haven't heard from in while, sadly), and Istanbul. Gizmo and Dune Echo would make great arguing partners and a challenge too. And I certainly feel more comfortable around my AIM friends - TICM, Aku, and Multani...
...I'll talk to all strangers, and have no fear of any strangers: I welcome strangers...
Nightstalkers, save yourself the trouble and make me the villain. Sorry I didn’t reply to your PM…