Search results

As an observer, I was wondering what the problem was with not having "named" mechanics in the set. The only thing that really differs between a "named" and an "unnamed" (at least to me) is that with a "named", you have a "template" or a common "shorthand" understanding of what it does. That...

I was being facetious.... :)

K9Archmage: That ratio is about right. I actually think the number of active posters is lower though, probably around 50-75.

I got it (well, the theory at least).

That sounds like just what I need for my W/R/G deck since I can use it for colorless! Oh, and what's up with this dopey 0cc artifact that gives you three mana but you have to put it in your graveyard? I might as well just put out 3 lands and then I can have 3 mana ALL the time... want it? :D

I don't think we want to make it a merely "Chronicles-like" set but include them in future editions (8th, for example).

Of all the CPA writers, despite not having written for awhile, my vote goes to TomB because they always rang a bell with me.

Another button at the top of the message forums for the chatroom might be helpful....

The subject of 'rogues' might becoming tiresome, but in my web surfing I only go her and the Dojo (and not even there recently because I'm trying to catch up here) so any news to me is "new" news. Besides, he did bring some new insights to the subject (at least to me).

Is anyone still interested in this, seeing how there hasn't been a word lately? I could kick it upstairs or check to see what is going on... Or you can just write your stories in Off-Topic, like those soap operas...

There is a way but I believe you have to have the list of words handy and as HM said, people just get around it (heck, they do it now) with ASCII letters or substitutions. It's pretty much just up to us editors to stay vigilant... :)

the neat organization of the idea :), but honestly, I think the General forum will go pretty fallow. IMHO, of course...

I remember talking about this game earlier and I think I said it was okay. It does seem rather anticlimatic at the end because you spend all this time building less than 6 or 7 victory pts and then whoosh! You get the last with no problem (at least with my games) just through upgrading and...

I was reading in the most recent Computer Gaming World that there's an expected 2001 release called Neverending Nights (or something like that) that is very D&D-ish, if not it exactly. And in the same issue WOTC has apparently scaled back its plans for a massive online D&D world. if anyone's...

Just a really great, funny story. I think it was SUPPOSED to be cards but Whimsy decided to keep it as a story.

Was it ASCII "code" like license plates or are you supposed to try to read it visually like a picture? I can't figure it out (but I imagine it's amusing :))

I agree, I'd like to see the old abilities come back.

if it'd ruin your theme, but you might want some mana accelerators in there since a lot of your stuff is at least 3cc. Or if this is casual MULTIPLAYER, then it might not matter... <shrug>

Since no one answered your question... Roughly, *combat* damage is part of the combat PHASE. Roughly, it goes: Beginning of combat Declare attackers Declare blockers Combat damage End of combat Stacks are built (if necessary) at each step (so you can respond and stuff).

I know it's a month late, but are you still working on this? Don't yell at me, everyone else, for bringing up an old post... :)