Search results

How can it hit players?

The problem with this card is in order for it to affect a player, he or she must play creatures. There are also combos involving an opponent receiving your creatures, but that doesn't seem likely to work all that well for deckbuilding purposes. It is possible to build a deck using Overburden...

"Well, this door seems fine and I can't hear anything behind it. I'll rest near it just in case..."

Hematoma

I do not know. Who is not ten years old?

Zap! (what I hope happens to the next person to remove the "e" from a word beginning with the "ex" prefix).

I don't know. That seems like a lot of money. So if I understand correctly, no headstones will be erected for this project. These people won't really be six feet under either...

...all of the blackberry farmers secretly...

That's not a very good name for a band. If they get murdered, people will just say, "Well, that's what happens when you tempt fate."

No cards prevent me from winning... Seriously though, if I hate any cards, it's the really bad cards like Chimney Imp...

Not quite. While I agree that countermagic is an integral part of the game, it is not the same type of card as Terror. For one thing, Terror only affects creatures. Counterspell can target virtually any spell as it is being played. There are a lot of creatureless decks. Spell-less decks? Not so...

Eh, I'm fine with either way. But I can't speak for everyone...

The dead Fridays are back?

...conceal from the entirely...

OOC: Why would there be traps in a room with the dudes sitting in here doing whatever it was they were doing?

Literature

Verily.

It's an Illuminati plot! What's your favorite conspiracy theory?

...mostly obsolete...

It depends on the format. In Vintage, the only aggressive decks that I can think of that have had much success recently are 5/3 and Food Chain Goblins (which is sort of aggro-combo). And then there are aggro-control decks in some formats. And there are prison-based decks that have done well...