Search results

Clayface

It seemed--suggestive... What was it supposed to mean?

I guess some people are losing their grip on reality...

They're going to invade!

*Readies bow*

This is too fragile at the moment, but it's a fun idea... 4x Overburden 4x Mana Breach 4x Night's Whisper 4x Urborg Emissary 4x Hoodwink 4x Elvish Spirit Guide 4x Dark Ritual 4x Lotus Petal 4x Talisman of Dominance 4x Gilded Lotus 4x Thran Dynamo 4x Sol Ring 4x Grim Monolith 4x Chrome Mox 4x...

Well, there are numerous ways to look at the flavor angle. Well, flavor is subjective. Some people are going to hate counterspells of any sort, no matter how balanced they are. Some people are going to dislike lands that do not tap for mana, regardless of what the card actually does. But from a...

That doesn't make any sense... :confused:

I'm sure someone does. Who would that person be?

Thwip!

Gusto is the third word in that post.

But that still seems to indicate that you believe that 1W does not equal WW.

Do you mean that I didn't give an explanation as to why I don't think it presents a flavor issue? I don't see how it would present a design issue, since it's been done successfully in the past. Could you explain why lands not tapping for mana WOULD present a design issue?

You disagree that 1W does not equal WW, but you're telling FoWS that you believe it was a mistake to make the change. How can it be a mistake if the two are the same?

Story A: ...a remote island in the sea of... Story B: ...a deadly mixture of atmospherium and...

Raiders

Evan D's latest post in this thread is what Spidey is referring to.

I'm not positive as to what those things are. What is a "Sno-Cap"?

I don't know if it's reasonable or not. I'm probably quite unreasonable myself... But lands that don't tap for mana don't present a flavor issue to me any more than a creature that cannot block or a legendary enchantment. Halls of Mist looks particularly cool (even though it is not particularly...

It needs no explanation. It would be like writing an essay about why 2 does not equal 3.