"Anyone can make a typo. But when you're criticizing someone else's use of language while playing the "I'm teach English" card, obvious mistakes like that one make you look bad."
It wasn't a card being played. Unless you're from another county (or website for this case), most everyone knows my background. Card, huh? This is my field of expertise. I have no idea what you do for a living, however, I when I point something out such as your incoherent inserts...trust me, it's clearly wrong.
"No? So you're changing your mind about me losing bud? Even supposing that an "ADD kid" would spout out something random (the ones I've met didn't seem to have this tendency) and that my comment was like that, it would still not be incoherent."
No, I didn't. How many times have I shouted out loud about the liberal attitude being displayed here? Well, sir, this is a good example. Who said I changed my mind? I pointed out that regardless of "right" or "wrong", that it was your attitude displayed was what brings out the "HOUTS". You can't act childish and think it'll back up your points. However, this shift of topic is what makes it so damn liberal. Going off track as usual. Stay with me puppy. And you wonder why I treat you guys like little children. Or, maybe because you truely are...
"Sure, why not?"
I think that answers all my questions.
Let me insert my retort to your above quote: Time cannot be measured.
What? You don't get it? Come on now...
Aren't you clever enough to understand what I'm saying?
I mean, I know where this quote came from. And without quotation marks, I am sure you'll for sure get it.
Pfft, everyone should understand this. I mean, if I do then everyone should!
See what I mean? You sound just like that.
"Nonsense. Anyone who has ever read or seen the play would recognize it almost immediately and understand the context. Those who don't might be puzzled or ignore it. I suppose another option would be to whine about it being out of place, but so far only one person has found it worthwhile to do that. In any case, the quote I dropped in did have context, even if you didn't recognize it.
Also, a lack of context does not indicate incoherency. If I ask Ransac whether or not he would like some cookies, and he replies, "I am in need of a putlog" (this would not be surprising coming from Ransac, as he is insane), his response seems to lack context, but it is still a coherent sentence."
See my above comments. You inserted an incoherent, randomly placed, and out of context statement into an already going semi-conversation. Yet, you have the balls to say I am whining?
Who said I was whining? You? I made a remark to your random sentence. I slapped your hand. "Bad Timmy, bad!"
You even pointed out that only ONE person got the joke.
You must be amazing at killing the buzz at any party.
You said: "Also, a lack of context does not indicate incoherency"
I didn't say lack of context. You have that worded wrong. *sigh*
Nor does it apply across the board. (my original point)
Yes-your sentence was incoherent based the context of the conversation. In your mind it might, but it doesn't qualify. Not to insult you here, but you can learn this in any 101 college class. *shrug*
Should I have to go over the basics of communication 101? Or, writing in context?
"I never said that my replies were witty. I hadn't considered them to be witty. But I guess that if I only compare them to your posts, they look rather witty..."
You're obviously trying to be 'witty' with your responses, regardless if you "considered" them to be or not. Then you back up your idiocy on the very next sentence above.
Childish attempts to insult in order to prove/back up a point.
"I have also seen sarcasm used in debates. One tactic I don't see in debates is "you lose bud." I can't wait to visit some local debate teams with this new technique. Clearly my opponents will be powerless against me, as they have lost all bud they once had by the power of my super-secret HOUTS technology"
Yeah, I have too. I aced debates classes at my college, but who cares. The "you lose bud" is referring to gamer language.
What, you didn't get it? I mean I got it. You should have.
(your silly logic)
This wasn't a debate. I was pointing out something you should have learned in your senior year of high school if not freshman college course. Sorry if you missed out on that lesson.
Your continual defensive measures are what makes this a 'debate' in your eyes. To me it's just another class session: teacher teaching the pupil.