Well yeah, I think we both want more people here. I think anything we do like this, though, be it hall of shame, hall of fame, CPA notables, or whatever pretty much comes with the caveat that there's never really a big community here. Well, that's certainly different from having a differing vision for how a hall of shame is supposed to work. I thought you wanted it to be more like a small group consisting of the very worst cards in the game, regardless of set. But if you're unsure of the concept entirely, well, how do you determine whether a card definitely doesn't belong? Then again, I suppose it's the same as anyone else determining whether a card doesn't belong, but other people are using more explicit criteria, which isn't necessarily good or bad either way. You put it in quotation marks, but I didn't say it, so who are you quoting? Maybe I'm being unclear, though. Maybe not. I don't know. I don't think I misinterpreted that part. I was sardonic about it, but when I made the "bouncer" quip I didn't mean that you wanted to be the arbiter of the whole thing. I was talking about what you made it seem like your vision for a hall of shame would be. Cards have to run a gauntlet to get in. There's a minimum standard of badness or something like that. Only cards that pass (or fail, rather) the Spiderman test would be eligible for you to want them in. That's not to say you want to mind-control everyone else. Perhaps, I should contrast it from how I'd describe my own vision... My vision for how a hall of shame would work is one in which we nominate cards and people present cases for why the cards they've nominated (or other cards if they change their minds) are worse than other cards in the set. Based on how they think the arguments stack up, the members cast their votes and choose the inductee for the set. Pretty similar to what we have now. Of course, in my vision, the card I choose is usually the one that wins because I usually think I'm right about which card is worst. But that's more because this is Oversoul's conceptual ideal for how the hall of shame functions. I don't mean that I should have special power just because I'm me. I did leave out the "none of the above option" because it's not in my vision, but other than that, I guess I'm satisfied with the current setup. Actually, I suppose I'd prefer an instant runoff system to the one we have now, but I didn't even think about it until this minute and it's probably cumbersome because we couldn't use the vBulletin poll feature (or at least I don't think so). But you've nominated cards in the past. I forget which ones, but I definitely remember that you nominated something at some point. Have you revised your opinion since then or what?