I think many members can agree the quality of my posts is rather unique. In fact, I would go as far as to say that I've said more things of essential importance than you have. I've seen your style: "No." "Yes." "I agree, because blah." "I disagree, because blah." If the human mind in general was this simple, this plain, this boring, I would have died from boredom and you wouldn't be talking to me to begin with. Luckily, you are not my first example of an "interesting human being," this coming from an avid human observer.
I've made a good number of friends, here and elsewhere, simply because of the way I write and choose to express my thoughts. I'm not going to change that for two members who, should I also add, happen to be known for their inability to get along and inability to admit it when they're wrong. You're too proud to be wrong, which is rather weak and immature, hence the utter worthlessness of your advice. Here's an advice: You're stuck up.
I've also noticed how you throw such old and weary slogans as "quality over quantity," "words to live by," "brevity is the soul of wit." That's too unoriginal for me, too impersonal. I'm too fiery for that. But to each his own, right? Not. I think my manner of communication is far superior to yours, frankly.
You're not tellling me that I can't write the way I do? <grin> Oh gee thanks for the clarification. Here is another clarification: you can't tell me what to do and what not to do, at all, ever, anywhere, anytime, anyhow.
Now be happy, kids. The Pope has answered his calling, finally.