Search results

Okay, you guys rest for a turn in the larger room. They each have holy symbols that were hidden under their robes but outside their armor that resemble their shields - a giant eye.

That seems to be what some people were saying in the Banning Speculation thread - that just banning the lands would only slow down Ravager/Disciple for a turn.

I have absolutely no idea how Portal might impact Vintage. I don't even know the cards. But I don't think it's worth it to petition to reprint the cards. Surely they can be found somewhere online... plus I think I have a couple boosters that were included in old Duelists if someone wants to...

... but will never be made...

And I thought they printed a "Juzam-like" creature by now... lemme look it up... Grinning Demon? {2}{B}{B} Creature -- Demon 6/6 At the beginning of your upkeep, you lose 2 life. Morph {2}{B}{B} (You may play this face down as a 2/2 creature for {3}. Turn it face up any time for its morph...

Ooo, only off by one word :p

But have you traded away the dual lands and Morphlings? Or are you holding out for some piece of the Power 9? :)

I do too, but you never know with the many "rules reversals" that have come up in the past 10 or so years of Magic :)

Good question.

Sorry Rondo, it's all human-sized :)

none

Hey guys, let's give him a big CPA welcome :) I actually do what I never do and suggested the CPA to him from the Magic Suitcase site because that site's more dead than not and y'all can give heaps of advice :)

Bertrem prays to his god but there is no visible effect on Cugel. Patrick takes the robes which reveals they are wearing plate mail underneath (possibly a reason why it was so hard to hit that last guy :) ) The questioning will take 5 turns (noted below in italics). The questioning proves to...

Happy Belated!

Let your ears hang low so they wobble to and fro. Who remembers actual video games in Chuck E. Cheeses way back when?

whatchamacallit

If you think so. I think they went hand-in-hand and equally important :)

Here's the original text (I have one, although I used CrystalKeep's original wording So it still says "destroy". So the next question is if D'Angelo's comment that "having 0 toughness or put into the graveyard is not a 'destroy' effect" still applied then, before 2000 when he made the ruling.

Hey, that's kinda what I said on 2/23: :)

You can always go to WOTC's Banned/Restricted Lists to keep up to date.