Search results

Kind of on-topic, but mostly I thought it was funny: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NC0Y7zMcn_4

*Arrows away!*

You never saw it because TurboLich was weird, hard to play, hard to build, not all that long-lived, and kind of unpopular. But it was still powered by Lich and could tear through people just like any combo deck. I really don't see how a card that allowed people to do that could be considered...

It's Ferret!

It's a neat concept, but I don't know how it would best be put to use. The most obvious thing would be that it's an expensive board-cleaner because it deals with even indestructible creatures and other pesky removal-resistant threats. But that just seems so bland...

COOOOOOLUUUUUUUUUUMMMMMMMMBBBBIIAAAAA RIIIIIIIIIIVVVEEEERRRRR!

I know it also prioritizes them by how many times they're linked to and by the priority of the sites linking to them...

Cold-Eyed Selkie is totally broken.

I'm not aware of any cases in which it was a "global warming card" specifically that played a big role in getting someone elected, but exploiting fear has certainly been a very popular tactic in elections. Yeah, other than in extreme circumstances, it seems that there are a lot of factors...

Melkor has a good pick with Farmstead. It does stand out as one of the most disappointing cards in the original set. Word of Command? Modus, are you insane? Here's a situation in which Word of Command is useful: Fireball. Sure, it's not the most godlike card ever and for the powerhouses in this...

Not that I don't sympathize, but I think you'll find that a little patience, literacy, understanding of the scientific method, and grasp of basic chemistry/physics/statistics (with research on some of the specific details in this case, as with any other case if you really want to understand...

*Readies bow*

Now you owe more than you currently owe? :confused:

Predicting weather is not the same as predicting climate. Predicting climate deals with statistical trends. It's still difficult to do, but it's not saying that on a certain day in the future it will be exactly this hot. It's saying that over a long period of time, the mean global temperature...

Nope. Old memory came back to me out of nowhere. Funny how that works sometimes, huh?

We can't really even be sure that new oil is being produced anywhere. It seems that the organisms producing it were aquatic plants and plankton, probably not all that different from the ones we have today. And it also seems that the conditions under which the oil was produced are still around...

Before the end of your turn, I declare that Mist Dragon: Gains flying Loses flying Gains flying Loses flying Gains flying Gains flying Gains flying Loses flying Gains flying Loses flying Gains flying Loses flying Gains flying Loses flying Gains flying Gains flying Loses flying Gains flying...

Wait. What kind of women aren't ethnic? :confused:

Well, I'm no climatologist and can't speak for them. I think in general, you're actually right. But sensationalism and alarmism isn't necessarily going to help us. And is that because you haven't looked? I mean, seriously. Look at ice core data, for one example. DF, just because both are...

Didn't I already say we were in a warming cycle? That's not the argument. Science doesn't do "proof." But there certainly is evidence that humans can have serious effects on global climate. Furthermore, this isn't at all farfetched or even new. Other species before us have profoundly affected...