P
Psarketos
Guest
Lets start with the most excellent Turgy (I presume Esquire). Person had the kindness to point out to me that I should provide / inquire / consider looking into enabling some better feedback options for my two recent articles, including the idea of making a thread regarding.
So to the points: Do you have feedback on MetaEsper, alternate decks or revisions you would make for a Modern legal deck comprised solely of instants and sorceries? Distaste for the whole concept (this would apply to most of the kids I teach Magic to - they consider my decks generally to be on the wrong side of eccentric)?
On a theory level, does it seem a reasonable argument that the empty set mathematics of corner case decks like MetaEsper and Transcension may dictate that comprehensiveness in Magic theory precludes both concision and thorough practical utility outside Standard format?
Thank you for whatever even tangentially constructive thoughts you choose to contribute!
- Dan Freagarthach, probably beating up on innocent high school kids with a zero nonland permanents Abzan Approach (of the Second Sun) Standard deck at this very moment
So to the points: Do you have feedback on MetaEsper, alternate decks or revisions you would make for a Modern legal deck comprised solely of instants and sorceries? Distaste for the whole concept (this would apply to most of the kids I teach Magic to - they consider my decks generally to be on the wrong side of eccentric)?
On a theory level, does it seem a reasonable argument that the empty set mathematics of corner case decks like MetaEsper and Transcension may dictate that comprehensiveness in Magic theory precludes both concision and thorough practical utility outside Standard format?
Thank you for whatever even tangentially constructive thoughts you choose to contribute!
- Dan Freagarthach, probably beating up on innocent high school kids with a zero nonland permanents Abzan Approach (of the Second Sun) Standard deck at this very moment