M
Mikeymike
Guest
Good stuff Sammy, I especially like the idea of getting an 'outside' judge. Although a general vote would work quite well too.I would be most open to a contest with no limitations on the articles, with the exception being that they have some sort of casual slant. I think we can all make our own assumptions as to what this means, and if someone pushes the envelope too far, it'll probably show up in the judges' decision. We've probably all read enough damn articles about playing Quiet Roar vs. Control Black to understand what is decidedly not casual.
However, the folks here are clever enough to come up with casual angles on all sorts of stuff, and I think that should be recognized. I could see articles coming in on breaking crap rares, hot multiplayer cards from recent sets, fun rogue-deck tourney reports, 5-color decks, theme decks, and rants about Randy Buehler's hair. And I'm sure the people here can have very unique approaches to each.
As for judging, I'm up for having a panel of judges or for putting it to a general vote. Maybe we could even get another site or a casual writer at another site to link to the main page of our contest, and "outsiders" could vote in some way.
Another thing regarding the Ante idea, considering how many people have posted here saying they'd be willing to donate prizes - I don't think a 1+ rare stipulation per entry would really scare anyone away. 2nd and 3rd place prizes are fine too, since we'd probably get a ton of cards.
Either way, I'm getting antsy to start. It sounds like this would go a long way to continue the CPA revitalization which I've noticed in the past few weeks or so.