...OK, cheesy MTV reference notwithstanding,
TomB:
As I said, if there is some kind of professional-style communication between representatives of WotC and representatives of the CPA, it's important to let WotC know that it's not just 300 or so people who are upset with whatever the issue is. There are thousands more out there who feel the same way about every issue, and although that also means that there are thousands out there who disagree (since we will have people who disagree with those who are in support of action), those who think a particular WotC decision is bad should not be ignored.
Although I think that a higher value has been placed on the community aspect by more recent members, you are part of the "founders'" group, and so you would have a better understanding of what it is you wanted to do with this site, and so you could decide to continue to support the community aspect, but also allow for more serious discussion on any important issue concerning WotC or Magic.
I think that the response (or lack thereof) to this question has shown that many members of this forum, most of whom are much more recent additions than you (not to make you feel old or anything
), don't really have an opinion, one way or another, on the question of the Mission Statement. However, I think that a question with more immediate repercussions (such as the current discussion on prerelease tournament experiences being held in the General CPA forum) may get a much better response.
You can see from the results of the most recent Voting Booth question, that certain issues are more important to people than others. To be quite honest, many of the really tough issues concerning Magic only have an impact on tournament-level players, so the casual players in this forum will not have any opinion on those issues. I think that it's tough to find problems in casual play that WotC has not addressed and that people are willing to discuss, not that there aren't any.
I get the idea you're pitching, though, and I think it would be a good idea, as long as discussions would be serious and geared towards improvement of Magic, rather than vilifying WotC. After all, how can the CPA be taken seriously by WotC if people only talk about how much they hate WotC, the R&D department, etc.?
In any case, I think it would be good to revisit the goals that the CPA was created for, since those goals are the reason why we are even able to discuss Magic in this kind of community. As I said before, however, I think the best part of the CPA is its acceptance of diverse opinions, and I think that the mission statement of the CPA should also have something in it that recognizes this community-oriented structure and atmosphere as part of what makes the CPA distinctive, and different from The Dojo or even Brainburst. It is, after all, part of what you're trying to do here.
As for those of you who voted but haven't expanded on your votes, all I have to say is that I always vote when I have an opinion on something, and I always have an opinion on something. Surely, if you voted, you must have an opinion, and this forum (and this entire site) is here so that you can give your opinions freely.