D
Duel
Guest
Okay, y'all remember Shawn "the Discriminator" Jackson? No? He's the one who rated Ransac's aritcle as one of the 10 worst online. Now you remember? Right, stop growling. His new list came out, you see. Some highlights from the new top 10 list (http://www.ccgprime.com:/mtg/10/12212000.htm)
Like I tried to say earlier, he seems like a decent guy. Oh, and my article's up there. Yeehaw?
Anyways, thought you should see that. Apparently, he is expressing his opinion, and only that (50% intangibles) so his breakdown of Ransac's article is based solely on his opinion, which he has a right to, right?
Just thought you guys should see this.
6. Russell Sherman – Rare Earths: The World According to Zadok
Score: 77%
Nail. Head.
Russell and David stumble upon something that is completely true, and is overlooked. They discuss extended, and what cards need to be banned, if anything. In the process, however, they find something profound; the real combo. If I ever do a rant on changing extended, this will be the first article I’ll quote.
well, we got publicity, I'll grant us that much10. Various – HAVE YOU SEEN THIS YET!
Score: 70%
http://www.magic-singles.com/cpa/forums/showthread.php?threadid=4343
Don’t f**k with the CPA. This is a response to the last two lists, and it’s a good read. Unfortunately, you won’t be able to add anything to this discussion, because the thread has been closed. Things to notice: the strength of the venom spewed, the free speech hypocrisy, the nervous breakdown of an editor.
Like I tried to say earlier, he seems like a decent guy. Oh, and my article's up there. Yeehaw?
Anyways, thought you should see that. Apparently, he is expressing his opinion, and only that (50% intangibles) so his breakdown of Ransac's article is based solely on his opinion, which he has a right to, right?
Just thought you guys should see this.