Search results

Hmm... maybe some tap ability should be mandatory... But they're not set in stone by WOTC, just happens to be following the designers at the current time (which could always change in the future, who knows :) )

Amazing Race Remaining Contestant assessment

<crack>

For more specifics, see his "A" post.

You're kidding. Does Oversoul go to the movies and/or eat candy?

It could be a "pauper's graveyard", perhaps for homeless or similarly unloved persons who have no one at their funerals...

You guys sit and rest with Rondo keeping watch at the east door and Cugel keeping watch at the west door.

Untap, Draw, Done. DF Life: 7 Hand: 1 In Play: (U) Island (U) Swamp Graveyard:Hypnotic Specter,Recoilx2,Rescind,Boomerangx2, Man O Warx2, Doomsday Specter x 2, mind twist, Abyssal Specter,Demonic Tutor, Upheaval, Warped Devotion, Island x 4, Swamp x 2 Removed From Game: Spidey Life: 20...

I'll take the Mirror-Mage and Deceiever.

DarthFerret: Are you assuming your opponent is playing creatures or that's the experience most of the time? Or should the situation of your opponent playing a creature-less deck be covered?

I wonder if Rosewater covered this in the past, of why they decide to make an effect a land or enchantment. I'm pretty sure they had a Land theme week at one point... I'd have to look. Well, since the discussion seems to be winding down and I can't really reply to your last statement since...

FoWS: I only thought the p/t should be adjusted to 2/3 IF you were going to make the cc 1W. But if you're staying with WW then keep it at 3/3. Oversoul: I disagree. There's probably a couple of pro/con arguments why a cc of one color might or might not equal 2 colorless due to flavor...

I think it might be okay for now; play-testing would have to try to see if it's under or overpowered. The wording is a bit "clunky" though. I'm thinking something like: "Whenever equipped creature blocks or becomes blocked by a creature, remove that creature from the game." Now, depending on...

Hey, I'd edit your post to include another idea or something, but grammar and spelling is up to you... :)

I think they're both okay, but leaning towards the first, just because it has more going on in the text :)

Agreed. Plus, you can "hold back" your revealing of creature cards initially and set it to a lower p/t and then if someone tries to do lethal damage to it, you can activate its ability again and reveal more creature cards, upping it's p/t... :)

It's okay. Might be a bit problematic with a few cards because their errata has changed between sets and rulings and you'd have to have a list of what they were at the chosen set, but probably still doable.

I don't think the codename indicates the theme of the set... :)

Ah, I see what you're saying...

oops, will correct...