Search results

I would drop Reanimate. Having more or less creature really depends on what direction you want to push the deck... Anyway, your deck has no Racks. You should remedy that...

Come on, you said no such thing...

Neverland...

I meant that weighted sleeves could help the cards land the right way...

"Short off in life"? What does that even mean? Does it have anything to do with two exclamation points being used in place of a question mark? "Now was that racist?" Uh, I guess it depends on what "that" is... Really, I was just making a joke with that line in my other post. But "against" is...

Heh, and you can cast it off LED, although that isn't too much help...

Flying and shadow? Might as well be unblockable...

Pestilence also hits players, which is important...

It's a cost anyone who is is not paralyzed can simply ignore... :rolleyes:

The phrase "opponent" would typically mean any player who is an opponent of the enchantment's controller. Which would mean if both players used creature-based decks, it would benefit only your opponent. The only advantage to the card would be if you were using a creatureless deck... I'm...

Well, I happen to have lands that do not produce mana. Nothing so impressive as Bazaar of Baghdad, but maybe someday... They still exist, even if Mark Rosewater does not like them.

Want to take care of blue? Okay, here's the plan... We'll infiltrate WotC, and change a couple of cards in the new set to some special reprints. They will be special because they will be Necropotence, Dark Ritual, Yawgmoth's Will, and maybe a couple of others. I'm not positive yet...

I really should have predicted that you'd bring up Magical Hack in this thread. I had the feeling this strong feeling that you would, but it was right after I'd already made my post...

How would they slow anything down?

Negligee

Ah, but KJ is not a zebra.

Invariably, they are fat and NEED to lose weight. Anorexia Nervosa?

*shrugs* Whispers: "Well, whatever we're going to do, let's not stand around here waiting for them to hear us."

Heh, racism... It is worded kind of funny. I believe that the idea is that all players set aside a number of creatures they control, equal to the amount of creatures controlled by the player who controls the fewest creatures. Bleh, I can't think of the simplest way to say that. And then all of...

Well, I said it is "not very good." Then three people posted comments defending it, largely be explaining how it can be used. I'm already familiar with how Boon can be used. I think I must have given the impression that I was not, because three people posted positive comments about Withering...