Search results

Oh. Of course. That makes sense. I wasn't thinking of sets for some reason...

So someone who has never committed a crime and has no intention of doing so is a danger to society?

Um, well, I know what "FAQ" stand for. But not "TS" or "MT."

"Shall we investigate the room?"

I think Istanbul was lurking semi-recently.

Ah. I found it. After my time, so I was completely unaware of it... # 420.5n - If a permanent has both a +1/+1 counter and a -1/-1 counter on it, N +1/+1 and N -1/-1 counters are removed from it, where N is the smaller of the number of +1/+1 and -1/-1 counters on it. [CompRules 2006/10/01]...

It would mean that the government pays for part it in order to lower the price. So if it were going to be $3.00, the government throws in enough money to keep the price down to $0.45 instead. I don't know that the Saudi government subsidizes it at all though. I would have thought they didn't...

Correct.

Does this work? The wording on the Redcap suggests that it wouldn't, because it says it gets returned to play if it had no -1/-1 counters, and after the first time it was returned, it would have a -1/-1 counter on it. I thought the +1/+1 counter merely canceled out the effect of the -1/-1...

So which justice would he be having assassinated? Or would the assumption be that one of the current ones will kick the bucket sometime soon?

I'll grant you that for terrorists if you like. It's a matter of semantics. We arrest people for murder, trying to blow stuff up, etc. Not for being a terrorist or admitting to being a terrorist. I would say that terrorists should have the same rights as everyone else. But being able to commit...

Chain Lightning, Flame Rift, Sonic Burst, Cave-In?

Yes, I'm double-posting. Sue me. Actually, I just thought my post was getting a little long and I wanted to address DF's last post separately. Okay, so Modus did open up the biblical contradictions can of worms. While I don't mind discussing that, it seems like it would hijack the thread. I...

Um, first amendment again? The government doesn't get a say in who churches appoint as leaders. If a church wants to exclude gays from being pastors or whatever, it can. And if a church wants to have a gay pastor, it can do that too. Um, yes. Why not? Fine, except what's this about a right...

I think I actually agree with most of what you're saying, but I'm confused as to what your actual stance is. Fair enough, but how would the government waste money on "debate"? My understanding is that it's about equal rights (uh, from the perspective of the people who want legalized gay...

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-gaymarriage16-2008may16,0,6182317.story

Ooooooooooooooollllllllllldddddddddddd!

Doesn't seem "dragging" today. And yeah, hopefully EB is alright. I didn't notice he wasn't posting, but that's because I haven't been posting much either.

No other Magic message boards, really.

Yeah, I think I already covered that one. Coal is used in generating electricity. A lot, actually. It's also used in iron smelting. But electricity is the big one. Probably the only other major modern-day uses for coal are using it to make natural gas and what is apparently called "synthetic...