O
orgg
Guest
So you want the cards with a small and difficult to read "10" on 'em? Good luck getting the 75%.
Yeah, I think I'd prefer a fancy "X" to a 6th Edition-style block letter "X." But either one would be better than the number "10" inside a hand of tiny cards...orgg said:I hope they don't make two symbols as similar as they did 8th/9th's. I'll take a nice "X," though I'd prefer it in the 7e style, not the 6e style.
Spidey, thinking is good for you.Spiderman said:But I don't want to have to think whether one expansion uses Roman numerals and another doesn't. Just make them all consistent one way or the other.
I disagree. I voted for 10 over X, specifically because I'd like to see a consistency established as early as possible in as many areas as possible for Magic. Similar to the consolidation of creature types, the addition of humans, the removal of interrupts and everything else that will ultimately bog the game down in the long run.Oversoul said:No, it really seems like a reasonable idea. But it's a little late to make them consistent now, don't you think?
Inconsistent > ugly.turgy22 said:But I like consistency and simplicity.
Like turgy22 said, it's never too late. I'm not really against the X, but just I'd like from this time forward to remain consistent, either stay with the Roman numerals (if X is chosen) or the 10. I don't want to see the same vote when 11th ed. comes out, for example.Oversoul said:No, it really seems like a reasonable idea. But it's a little late to make them consistent now, don't you think?
They could be consistent from now on, I suppose, but being that I dislike the style used for 8th/9th Edition, I wouldn't want it to continue being consistent from there...